Pe vs. Pe
CECILIO PE, ET AL., plaintiffs-appellants,vs.ALFONSO PE, defendant-appellee. G.R. No. L-17396 May 30, 1962 FACTS: Plaintiffs are the parents, brothers and sisters of
Read moreGASHEM SHOOKAT BAKSH, petitioner,vs.HON. COURT OF APPEALS and MARILOU T. GONZALES, respondents. G.R. No. 97336 February 19, 1993 FACTS: Private respondent is
Read moreNIKKO HOTEL MANILA GARDEN and RUBY LIM, petitioners,vs.ROBERTO REYES, a.k.a. “AMAY BISAYA,” respondent. G.R. No. 154259 February 28, 2005 FACTS: Roberto Reyes
Read moreBEATRIZ P. WASSMER, plaintiff-appellee,vs.FRANCISCO X. VELEZ, defendant-appellant. G.R. No. 20089 December 26, 1964 FACTS: Beatriz Wassmer and Francisco Velez decided to get
Read moreERNESTO RAMAS UYPITCHING and RAMAS UYPITCHING SONS, INC., petitioners,vs.ERNESTO QUIAMCO, respondent. G.R. No. 146322 December 6, 2006 FACTS: Respondent Ernesto C. Quiamco
Read moreALICE REYES VAN DORN, petitioner,vs.HON. MANUEL V. ROMILLO, JR., as Presiding Judge of Branch CX, Regional Trial Court of the National
Read moreEMETERIO CUI, plaintiff-appellant,vs.ARELLANO UNIVERSITY, defendant-appellee. G.R. No. 15127May 30, 1961 FACTS: Emetrio Cui (plaintiff) took up preparatory law course in Arellano University
Read moreANTONIO A. MECANO, petitioner,vs.COMMISSION ON AUDIT, respondent. G.R. No. 103982December 11, 1992 FACTS: Antonio Mecano is a Director II of the National
Read moreFELIZA P. DE ROY and VIRGILIO RAMOS, petitioners,vs.COURT OF APPEALS and LUIS BERNAL, SR., GLENIA BERNAL, LUIS BERNAL, JR., HEIRS OF
Read moreLORENZO M. TAÑ;ADA, ABRAHAM F. SARMIENTO, and MOVEMENT OF ATTORNEYS FOR BROTHERHOOD, INTEGRITY AND NATIONALISM, INC. (MABINI), petitioners,vs.HON. JUAN C. TUVERA,
Read moreD. M. CONSUNJI, INC., petitioner,vs.COURT OF APPEALS and MARIA J. JUEGO, respondents. G.R. No. 137873April 20, 2001 FACTS: At around 1:30 p.m.,
Read moreCOMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner,vs.PHILIPPINE HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS, INC., Respondent. G.R. No. 168129 April 24, 2007 FACTS: The Philippine Health Care Providers,
Read moreCHU JAN, plaintiff-appellee,vs.LUCIO BERNAS, defendant-appellant. G.R. No. 10010August 1, 1916 FACTS: The CFI rendered judgment dismissing the appeal without special finding as
Read moreTHE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, petitioner,vs.HONORABLE JUDGE AMANTE P. PURISIMA, COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF MANILA, BRANCH VII, and PORFIRIO CANDELOSAS,
Read moreCOMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE and ARTURO V. PARCERO in his official capacity as Revenue District Officer of Revenue District No.
Read more